Politics: J'accuse!

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Lieberman - Clinton.

http://abcnews.go.com/images/pdf/824a1Lieberman.pdf

Y'know, you are really sexy and hot.

I will give you Lieberman, but he is a Dem in name only.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I would like to say that I thought of posting this very example, or perhaps something later in Clinton's second term -- pardons, anyone? -- but then I thought, why feed the beast? She can't be that obtuse. You're just encouraging her.

True, but it'll be fun to see when Bilmore explains that, by posting something that shows a Dem criticizing the Dem president, you really are proving his and Not Me's point that doing so is really endemic to the Dem soul because, um, er.... I think it's that exception that prove the rule thingy.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Not Me
Only after the DNA showed he giszed on her dress. JFC, it takes irrefutable DNA evidence of sperm on an intern's dress before a Dem will criticize a Dem.

Good point. Because we all remember that from the very first days of the Clinton White House, he got the Democratic Party behind him in lockstep, and after those heady victories on gays in the military and the Hillary Healthcare Plan, it was one big cakewalk of mutual agreement and wagon circling until the heady Monica debacle, pun intended.

Nothing could ever make me use the term "happy" in reference to something that resulted in the death of so many Americans.

Me neither, which is why the word "happy" preceded and modified the words "side effect."

Hey Ty - was that you I saw demonstrating in SF Saturday:

You know, I thought this

looked like you would look, but I wasn't sure. I understand the gender issue now. I guess Al Franken's work cuts a little too close to home, eh?

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Scalia sent his letter on Friday. I saw this and posted on the following Monday, so unless your standard item of measurement is an egg timer, I'm not sure what you mean, unless the goal is to simply extend the thread.

Actually what i mean is stp:

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...5077#post85077

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Not Me
Only after the DNA showed he giszed on her dress. JFC, it takes irrefutable DNA evidence of sperm on an intern's dress before a Dem will criticize a Dem.

Oh, for Christ's sake, come off it.

Do you contend that Dems uniformly supported welfare reform in 1996? That Clinton took no criticism for this from his own party?

Do you claim that Dems uniformly supported Clinton's efforts at health care reform in the early part of his first term? What about his efforts to change the military's policy on gays?

Clinton came out of the DLC, the very existence of which was premised a critique of the Dem party from within.

You are a ridiculous, stupid twit. Interestingly, though, the fact that NOT A SINGLE "REPUBLICAN" POSTER HAS BEEN WILLING TO SAY THAT YOU ARE INCORRECT is rather fascinating, given the context.


(I would say that it's ironic, but then Gatti will do his Alanis imitation, and we don't want that.)

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Not Me
Actually what i mean is stp:

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...5077#post85077

Right. Because God forbid that Gatti actually himself express admiration for Scalia's conduct on a point on which Gatti criticized him. After all, that might affect your view of him as part of the Democratic Monolith.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Do you claim that Dems uniformly supported Clinton's efforts at health care reform in the early part of his first term? What about his efforts to change the military's policy on gays?

If I criticize you for failing to stp, does that mean Gattigap's going to sing?

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Not Me
I will give you Lieberman, but he is a Dem in name only.

Oh. Next time, do us a favor and post a list of "real Dems" versus "Dems in name only" before starting these arguments. You could have saved me the four hours I spent collecting Zell Miller quotations responsive to your inquiry.

[SlaveNoMore]

Sidd Finch
Interestingly, though, the fact that NOT A SINGLE "REPUBLICAN" POSTER HAS BEEN WILLING TO SAY THAT YOU ARE INCORRECT is rather fascinating, given the context.

Dude, it's baseball season and this is a football season Board.

PS - How much does Southwest out of Oakland suck? Fucking A.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
You know, I thought this

looked like you would look, but I wasn't sure.

Uncanny. You know me IRL, don't you?

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
If I criticize you for failing to stp, does that mean Gattigap's going to sing?

Probably, but fortunately doing so would go against your very Nature.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by Not Me
Uncanny. You know me IRL, don't you?

Uncanny is definitely not the word I would use to describe Pam.

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by Not Me
Uncanny. You know me IRL, don't you?

I hear everyone does.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
against your very Nature.

Soul, but whatever.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
It is true that one happy side effect of the massive fuck-up that Bush et al. have made of Iraq is that many Republicans are disenchanted with Bush.

Right effect, wrong reason, bucko.

It's the massive spending spree designed to curry favor with Senate Dems. It wipes out the concept of smaller government, builds expectations the wrong way, and, ultimately, the people he's pandering to just turn around and bite him on the ass for it anyway. It's just dumb.