Waiting for Fitzgerald

[nononono]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
WILLEY AND BROADDRICK SPEAK OUT! RAPISTS MOCK VICTIMS!!

Dateline: Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) October 19, 2005 -- The spokesman for former President, rapist and serial sexual abuser Bill Clinton derided the upcoming visit to the Clinton Library by sexual assault victims Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey, according to recently published reports. The duo plans to tour the Library on October 26 with attorney Candice E. Jackson to promote awareness of Bill and Hillary Clinton's treatment of women and to call for donations to groups that fight domestic violence. Jackson -- who is a survivor of rape -- earlier this year authored a book that alleged abuses of power by the Clintons against Broaddrick, Willey, and a half dozen other women.

The taunts by Clinton spokesman Jay Carson were published late last week in the New York Daily News' “Lowdown” feature.

This playful statement stands in stark contrast to the serious allegations made by Broaddrick and Willey. Broaddrick alleges that Clinton raped her during a conference in Little Rock in 1978, and Willey says that he sexually assaulted her when she worked in the White House in 1993. Both also charge that Clinton's inner circle -- including Hillary Rodham Clinton -- subsequently attempted to intimidate them into silence.

“It's disdainful that Bill Clinton's spokesman would mock Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey and then boast about the Library's attendance,” said Jackson. “It's not surprising, though -- this is the modus operandi that Team Clinton has always used to discredit, intimidate, and silence the women who've tried to shine a light on Clinton’s history of misogyny. Whether it means labeling accusers as 'trash looking for cash' or even sending thugs to scare them, apparently nothing is off limits.”

Jackson also noted the irony in Carson's statement given that US News & World Report earlier this year reported that the Clinton Library publicly overstated its attendance figures. [HE LIED]

Broaddrick, Willey, and Jackson also issued a public invitation to other women who claim to have been assaulted by Clinton to join them for the tour. Jackson noted that while researching her book she came across multiple accounts of women who were too intimidated to go public, prompting her to add: “We'd like to welcome any of the women who’ve been assaulted -- whether they have previously gone public or not -- to join us. We want to see the Library's version of Clinton's 'legacy' firsthand, and to make the public aware of any omissions.”

None of the women touring the Clinton Library are receiving sponsorships or financial consideration for the activity, and a portion of the proceeds from all sales of Jackson's book “Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine” are going to a charity that works to prevent domestic abuse.

Is there a link to what Carson said, or did I miss it in there?

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by nononono
Is there a link to what Carson said, or did I miss it in there?

Egg-sactly.

True soldiers in the War Against All Things Clinton would've taken the time to pull that quote and put it in the biggest font possible. Clearly, Penske's just phonin' it in at this point, worse than Alan Arkin in Glen Garry, Glenross.

Sad.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by nononono
Is there a link to what Carson said, or did I miss it in there?

I gave you the link to the whole piece. It is in there.

Here it is for your convenience:

The taunts by Clinton spokesman Jay Carson were published late last week in the New York Daily News' “Lowdown” feature. Carson is quoted as telling columnist Lloyd Grove that he had no concerns about Willey and Broaddrick's visit. The spokesman stated: “The Clinton Library has shattered all attendance records this year, and we're always happy to hear about new visitors.”

This playful statement stands in stark contrast to the serious allegations made by Broaddrick and Willey.................Jackson also noted the irony in Carson's statement given that US News & World Report earlier this year reported that the Clinton Library publicly overstated its attendance figures.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Egg-sactly.

True soldiers in the War Against All Things Clinton would've taken the time to pull that quote and put it in the biggest font possible. Clearly, Penske's just phonin' it in at this point, worse than Alan Arkin in Glen Garry, Glenross.

Sad.

Translation: I support rape and sexual harrassment and abuse in the office place (except by American soldiers doing it to Islamist terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Guantamo as an interrogation tactic-in that case I side with the enemy) and in fact think it's a big joke.

A woman got raped and beaten and was coerced after the fact into not reporting it.....another woman got sexually fondled at work by the aforesaid rapist.........ha ha ha ha ha LOL ha ha ha ha ha ROTFLMAO!!! They probably deserved it. Whores.

[bilmore]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
The spokesman stated: “The Clinton Library has shattered all attendance records this year, and we're always happy to hear about new visitors.”

The women's efforts seem misguided. If they are going to invite all of the other women molested by Clinton over the years to meet them at the library, the library's new attendance figures WILL shatter records.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by bilmore
The women's efforts seem misguided. If they are going to invite all of the other women molested by Clinton over the years to meet them at the library, the library's new attendance figures WILL shatter records.

They are not thinking clearly. Post-traumatic stress disorder. It is sad to see the affects of rape and sexual abuse on two vibrant and intelligent women. They should gather their felloe survivors and become a travelling caravan shadowing Madame Hillary's Senate campaign trail.

Justice delayed is justice denied......thoughts?

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
They are not thinking clearly. Post-traumatic stress disorder. It is sad to see the affects of rape and sexual abuse on two vibrant and intelligent women. They should gather their felloe survivors and become a travelling caravan shadowing Madame Hillary's Senate campaign trail.

Justice delayed is justice denied......thoughts?

I think you should go with that idea.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Gattigap
I think you should go with that idea.

Translation: Rape and sexual abuse are excusable if Bill Clinton is the perpetrator as it was just sex, which is a private, which is protected by an emanating penumbra.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Translation: I support rape and sexual harrassment and abuse in the office place (except by American soldiers doing it to Islamist terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Guantamo as an interrogation tactic-in that case I side with the enemy) and in fact think it's a big joke.

A woman got raped and beaten and was coerced after the fact into not reporting it.....another woman got sexually fondled at work by the aforesaid rapist.........ha ha ha ha ha LOL ha ha ha ha ha ROTFLMAO!!! They probably deserved it. Whores.

The various women's organizations across this country lost all credibility when they did not attack Bill Clinton. They immediately assumed Anita Hill was telling the truth even though she followed Clarence Thomas to a new job after such "harassment" took place. In addition, most harrassers show a tenancy to commit such acts and usually leave a trail of victims in their wake - look at John Tower, Bob Packwood and Bill Clinton. But with Clarence Thomas no other women came forward. Yet all the womens groups and liberal organization immediately assumed she was telling the truth.

The constant refrain against Clarence Thomas (to justify why such conduct was relevent in the hearings) was that since he was an harraser he could not be trusted on womens issues when such issues came before the court. Yet Clinton, a clear sexual harasser, was trusted with the top policy making position in the country.

When Anita Hills crediblity was questioned US Senators were harangued for attacking the victim, yet when James Carville said that when you spread money around a trailer park no tellling what you druge up - such an attack on the victim was narely critisized.

The most damaging event to the womens movement last century was a self inflicted wound. The immediate assumption of guilt on Clarence Thomas and the silence on Bill Clinton was one of the most hypocritical and shameful events in US history.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Translation: Rape and sexual abuse are excusable if Bill Clinton is the perpetrator as it was just sex, which is a private, which is protected by an emanating penumbra.

No, I actually think you should go with that idea, Penske. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

[Sexual Harassment Panda]

Originally posted by bilmore
The women's efforts seem misguided. If they are going to invite all of the other women molested by Clinton over the years to meet them at the library, the library's new attendance figures WILL shatter records.

Will W's Presidential Library include a coke bar?

[pubic hair on a coke can]

Originally posted by Spanky
The various women's organizations across this country lost all credibility when they did not attack Bill Clinton. They immediately assumed Anita Hill was telling the truth even though she followed Clarence Thomas to a new job after such "harassment" took place. In addition, most harrassers show a tenancy to commit such acts and usually leave a trail of victims in their wake - look at John Tower, Bob Packwood and Bill Clinton. But with Clarence Thomas no other women came forward. Yet all the womens groups and liberal organization immediately assumed she was telling the truth.

The constant refrain against Clarence Thomas (to justify why such conduct was relevent in the hearings) was that since he was an harraser he could not be trusted on womens issues when such issues came before the court. Yet Clinton, a clear sexual harasser, was trusted with the top policy making position in the country.

When Anita Hills crediblity was questioned US Senators were harangued for attacking the victim, yet when James Carville said that when you spread money around a trailer park no tellling what you druge up - such an attack on the victim was narely critisized.

The most damaging event to the womens movement last century was a self inflicted wound. The immediate assumption of guilt on Clarence Thomas and the silence on Bill Clinton was one of the most hypocritical and shameful events in US history.

Fo' shizzle my bizzle!!!

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Gattigap
No, I actually think you should go with that idea, Penske. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

It's amasing the gutters the left will troll to defend a rapist. If your wife or mother or daughter were raped or sexually harassed and abused in workplace and then intimidated at risk of life from accessing justice would you find it so amusing?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Spanky
The various women's organizations across this country lost all credibility when they did not attack Bill Clinton. They immediately assumed Anita Hill was telling the truth even though she followed Clarence Thomas to a new job after such "harassment" took place. In addition, most harrassers show a tenancy to commit such acts and usually leave a trail of victims in their wake - look at John Tower, Bob Packwood and Bill Clinton. But with Clarence Thomas no other women came forward. Yet all the womens groups and liberal organization immediately assumed she was telling the truth.

The constant refrain against Clarence Thomas (to justify why such conduct was relevent in the hearings) was that since he was an harraser he could not be trusted on womens issues when such issues came before the court. Yet Clinton, a clear sexual harasser, was trusted with the top policy making position in the country.

When Anita Hills crediblity was questioned US Senators were harangued for attacking the victim, yet when James Carville said that when you spread money around a trailer park no tellling what you druge up - such an attack on the victim was narely critisized.

The most damaging event to the womens movement last century was a self inflicted wound. The immediate assumption of guilt on Clarence Thomas and the silence on Bill Clinton was one of the most hypocritical and shameful events in US history.

NOW and NARAL are the most vile of political organisatiosn in America. But for the First Amendment I would argue that they should be outlawed. Not to mention that many of their members lack a capability for even the most basic ADLs. what is with the left and lack of hygiene?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Translation: Rape and sexual abuse are excusable if Bill Clinton is the perpetrator as it was just sex, which is a private, which is protected by an emanating penumbra.

Poll to gatti and the others-

Do you disbelieve Paula Jones' claim that Bill dropped trou on her?