Waiting for Fitzgerald

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Penske. certainly the Bilbe directs us to try and bring the sinners around. But at some point, when it is clear they will not move, when it is clear they mock us, Do we not run the danger of becoming a benefit to their sins? Might it be better if the right thinkers leave this PB and go elsewhere? Perhaps RT would consider a PB limited to those who do believe?

I started a blog. I imagine soon I will be selling t-shirts and coffee mugs on it.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Aren't they the genesis of your beloved Separation of church and state?

Today, at Mass, one of the scriptures cited by the babyjesuschristsuperstar's representative was Romans 8:38,39:

"For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ BabyJesus our Superstar"

I imagine that the definition of "things present, nor things to come" includes the hatefully ignorant faux-intellectual elitist snobs of the looney left who would mock and naysay that which is true and the font of the Universal Moral Code.

Feel the love.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Aren't they the genesis of your beloved Separation of church and state?

Soon, Hank will distance himself from this comment, asserting that by making this snarky comment, he wasn't implicitly endorsing a religion, no, no religion at all, nor suggesting that anyone criticizing religion was a lefty pinko commie worshipping the evils of secular humanism (not at all!), but instead was merely suggesting that by saying that old-line Puritans would've burned biologists, Sebby and other liberals are indulging in their own brand of stereotyping and intolerance that Sebby finds so repulsive in others.

Over/under is 2.5 days.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Soon, Hank will distance himself from this comment, asserting that by making this snarky comment, he wasn't implicitly endorsing a religion, no, no religion at all, nor suggesting that anyone criticizing religion was a lefty pinko commie worshipping the evils of secular humanism (not at all!), but instead was merely suggesting that by saying that old-line Puritans would've burned biologists, Sebby and other liberals are indulging in their own brand of stereotyping and intolerance that Sebby finds so repulsive in others.
.

The intolerance, bias, prejudice and hate of the looney left against and of God, the babyjesus, religion and morality is obvious to anyone with 20/20 vision observing the attempts of said looney left to destroy the foundations of American culture. Thankfully Hank is on the frontlines of the patriotic movement to turn back this evil tide.

In an effourt to bridge the gap of intolerance, I am inviting a cadre of leftists to my home for wine and cheese next week. The first person to invoke the bias and hate of the loonie left will be escorted out at the butt end of the exercise of my Second Amendment rights.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Soon, Hank will distance himself from this comment, asserting that by making this snarky comment, he wasn't implicitly endorsing a religion, no, no religion at all, nor suggesting that anyone criticizing religion was a lefty pinko commie worshipping the evils of secular humanism (not at all!), but instead was merely suggesting that by saying that old-line Puritans would've burned biologists, Sebby and other liberals are indulging in their own brand of stereotyping and intolerance that Sebby finds so repulsive in others.

Over/under is 2.5 days.

I'll take 1.5, and I'll bet you my killer seats in purgatory. 50 yard line... you see the babyjesussuperstar run the qb sneak up close and personal.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'll take 1.5, and I'll bet you my killer seats in purgatory. 50 yard line... you see the babyjesussuperstar run the qb sneak up close and personal.

The babyjesi don't swing that way, nttawwt, but we appreciate and are flattered by your "proposition".

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Aren't they the genesis of your beloved Separation of church and state?

No, they're not. They left England to avoid persecution, and then came to America and practiced exactly the persecution they left to avoid. The Puritans are the true mentors of the unwashed literalists littering the country with their fundamentalist idiocy.

The separation of church and state was nailed by Jefferson, I believe.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
The babyjesi don't swing that way, nttawwt, but we appreciate and are flattered by your "proposition".

Bullshit. Your line's for shit and nobody's ever open. Peter can't run a short pattern (terrible wheels) and the Holy Ghost has hands like a blacksmith. He never met a pass he couldn't drop. If the bjss didn't run those sneaks, you'd have no fucking offense.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'll take 1.5, and I'll bet you my killer seats in purgatory. .

It's interesting that while you previously expressed an interest in box seats in hell, you have now upgraded yourself to purgatory (a fate I suggested for you not so long ago, which was met with your scoffs). Good to see you are coming around Sebby. The babyjesus has penetrated you, sts, iyw. Keep feeling the love and soon you can join Us on the light side.....the right side.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Bullshit. Your line's for shit and nobody's ever open. Peter can't run a short pattern (terrible wheels) and the Holy Ghost has hands like a blacksmith. He never met a pass he couldn't drop. If the bjss didn't run those sneaks, you'd have no fucking offense.

To be honest, I don't understand football allusions. I avoid TV on the Lord's Day.

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Spanky, if you've been reading my posts you know I don't question evolution where it has evidence. The dispute comes where it's pure conjecture, because coincidentially that is where it could be god instead. and I'm not arguing either is right. I'm just saying your beloved scientist don't know either.

Would you like your kids to be taught global warming is a fact?

Questions evolution where it has no evidence? Why do you focus on evolution? The problem is that evolution has a host of critics that dervie their objections purely from the religious beliefs and try and cloak them in science. So any objections to evolution are immediately suspect.

There are a multitude of other theories in other science classes that have many more problems than evolution. If you are going to start looking into theories that should not be taught you need to start in a place where the evidence is far less conclusive. For example: How the dinasours became extinct or how humming birds fly.

If you are going to point out gaps in evolutionary theories you need to cite some scientific article that points out such gaps. And it can't be a Ty cite (a clearly biased source like a manuscripts out of Liberty University). I think you will find such Gaps have been pointed out by religious laymen and not experts.

As far as Global Warming is concerned, I have no problem with a class that cites statistics of the earth getting warmer. However, the fact that the earth is going to continue to get warmer is not a fact. And no science class would ever teach that. There are no facts about the future only predictions. And as long as Global Warming is taught as a prediction, I have no problem with that.

If the majority of climatologists think the earth is going to get warmer, then they can say that in class.

But concerning the past and evolution, certain sub - theories of evolutionary theory have less evidence than others, but as far as I know, there isn't a statistically signicant number of legitimate biologists, Geneticists or evolutioninsts that think man did not evolve some other primate and that all complicated lifeforms on earth did not evolve from single celled animals.

Am I wrong?

[Spanky]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
I agree with Hank's posit, and so does the babyjesuschristsuperstar. Woe unto those who don't.

Is the former Pope (JP II) burning in hell for his acknowledgement of the truth of evolution?

[Ty@50]

My free trial of the time travel software ends next Thursday. To extend it I need 1 Million $. The great thing is that if you guys raise 25K in your time and put it in the bank it will be 1 million in my time.

Anybody want to volunteer to match funds?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Spanky

There are a multitude of other theories in other science classes that have many more problems than evolution. ............... For example: How the dinasours became extinct........

Wait. Spanky is a Penske sock?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by Gattigap
Soon, Hank will distance himself from this comment, asserting that by making this snarky comment, he wasn't implicitly endorsing a religion, no, no religion at all, nor suggesting that anyone criticizing religion was a lefty pinko commie worshipping the evils of secular humanism (not at all!), but instead was merely suggesting that by saying that old-line Puritans would've burned biologists, Sebby and other liberals are indulging in their own brand of stereotyping and intolerance that Sebby finds so repulsive in others.

Over/under is 2.5 days.

Sam. remember You were wondering why I have become so caustic.