Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I didn't say that I don't think guilty people have walked because probative evidence was excluded, did I?
|
You said: "That's why the exclusionary rule doesn;t result in the criminal going free."
So like Ty you have contradicted yourself.
You said the exclusionary ruled doesn't result in the criminal going free. You didn't say that the exclusionary rule doesn't always result.......... Or most of the time. You said the exclusionary ruled DOESN'T result.
In certain circumstances it does. Your statement was wrong.
Threaded Mode