LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 706
0 members and 706 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-13-2005, 12:02 PM   #11
Penske_Account
WacKtose Intolerant
 
Penske_Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PenskeWorld
Posts: 11,627
Strict Construction

Quote:
Originally posted by Captain
What my other posts get to is that a true strict constructionist would severely limit rights people take for granted today, like much of what we view as freedom of the press. Another example is freedom of religion. There was a smattering of anti-Catholic leglislation still on the books in the early states, and then a torrent of anti-Catholic legislation was adopted as Irish immigration picked up at the time of the famines. It is not clear what the constitutional standards really would be with respect to freedom of religion until relatively late in the 19th century.

The papists need to be constrained, but notwithstanding that, the expansiveness of all of our rights is, quite simply, guaranteed by the Second Amendment, the only Amendment that really counts.
__________________
Since I'm a righteous man, I don't eat ham;
I wish more people was alive like me



Penske_Account is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.