LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,221
0 members and 1,221 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-25-2005, 02:27 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Sorry, Flinty, nothing personal

Quote:
Originally posted by soup sandwich
But doesn't the moral code change? And, if so, how do we account for the fact that the moral code changes? If the code is instinctive, why is the moral code of a person in 2005 (e.g., anti-slavery) different than the code of a person in 100 A.D. (slavery of one's enemies is OK)? Has our creator endowed the person of 2005 with different rights than the person of 100 A.D.

If this has been covered before in this discussion I apologize, I haven't read the full thread.
I don't think it has really changed. I think even in 100 A.D. people knew instinctively that slavery was wrong, but certain people benefited and therefor kept it going. During Roman times many philosophers suggested slavery was wrong. I think as time moves forward there is a slow progression towards changes in the law and human societies conforming more towards the code.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07 AM.