LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 274
0 members and 274 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-16-2005, 07:10 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Just for Fun

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Not necessarily, although 18 years certainly was selected in light of the current number of nine, and teh stagger wouldn't work so well if the number were larger.

What if the amendment to Article III simply said "The judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good Behaviour, except that Congress shall have the power to fix a maximum term of service for judges of the supreme Court, . . .

The staggering will never be perfect because inevitably a justice will die before the term is up.

Anyway, Congress could set the length at whatever it pleases. (one could also include in the amendment a provision "maximum term of service, but not less than 18 years, for judges
We've talked about this idea before, and it's a good one, although I wouldn't want to leave the time period in Congress' hands.
sgtclub is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.