Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Of course Clinton lied under oath.
As for whether Bush lied, why don't we just say that we don't know enough about his state of mind yet. (You didn't read the Schmitt thing, did you?)
Suppose someone said that there was "no doubt" that there were WMD in Iraq, or that "we know where the WMD are." Given that the intelligence was ambiguous, and that we did not in fact know where the WMD were, would not those be lies?
|
You know how you keep saying stuff is a fact or proven, then when pressed you link a blog?
Should we dismiss you as a liar lacking credibility?
