LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,149
0 members and 1,149 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 11-08-2005, 03:16 PM   #162
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
What is the problem?

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
Tell that to all the part-time workers at Wal-Mart who will never be full-timers, because full-time employees have to be paid benefits.
No one has to be given benefits, wanker. They could give health and other non-retirement benefits just to managers and above if they bought insurance rather than self-insuring. It's just not good for PR. And, you can't exclude a category "part time" from retirement plans -- so if you have full-time and part-time people in the same job classifications, the way to keep people out is to ensure that they don't work more than 1,000 hrs/year.

But the thing where they were going to add somewhat strenuous physical activity (pushing carts in the summer in 90+ heat is strenuous) to every low-level job classification to discourage people with health problems (and probably the elderly) from applying was possibly, like, illegal. Heh.
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.