LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 849
0 members and 849 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2005, 12:16 PM   #3806
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,280
Proposition 2

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
Here's the best source if you're really looking: http://www.tlc.state.tx.us/pubsconam...analyses05.pdf

What you're seeing isn't the actual language, but what gets put on the ballot (which, I must say, is a screwy way to have people vote on an amendment - I would think you'd have to put up the actual words you're changing from and to, but, hey, what do I know?) and the actual language is clearer.
My question wasn't about the analysis. My question was about the language that we're voting for. I do not think that the following language is any clearer than the language on the ballot, and I think, reading the language on its face, that a reasonable person could determine that the legislature is asking us to eliminate marriage all together.

Sec. 32. (a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.