LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 863
0 members and 863 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-25-2005, 11:46 AM   #3803
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Proposition 2

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
"a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage"

i.e., "You, City of Round Rock, may not grant health care benefits to the non-spousal heterosexual domestic parters of your employees, because they are FORNICATORS."

ETA: Yeah, I'm a little slow. Whiff. Sin, Texas. That's just outside of Brady, right?
Sweet pea, that's different than outlawing housing arrangements.

Are you trying to stand in for Ty?

ETA and currently 247 of the Fortune 500 have domestic partner benefits, per Human Rights Campaign Foundation: http://www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?Sect...rchSubTypeID=1
__________________
I'm using lipstick again.

Last edited by ltl/fb; 10-25-2005 at 11:58 AM..
ltl/fb is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.