Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I guess it's no. I think our country is enlightened, educated and based on a communal moral foundation to be of a collective judgment, inherently, that having a man, any man, of any party, who rapes and violently beats a woman and is a serial sexual abuser of subordinate (NPI) woman in the workplace, as president or a presidential candidate is wrong.
|
I agree completely. However, Clinton was still a better choice for president than any of the other options
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
For my part regardless of whether I do or not, I have enough respect for the rule of law to advocate that an injustice and infringement of a fellow citizens rights,m such as occured with Broaddrick or Willey et al, has no place in America and I feely duly passionate about that.
|
I certainly agree with you in the abstract. However, I see no indication that you give a rats ass about the rule of law or the rights of man except to the extent it suits your partisan political purposes.
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
so what you saying is that any of the prosecutions in recent times for past civil rights violations (eg Byron De la beckwith et al) are the result of people who are either unbalanced or have lived an extraordinarily sheltered life?
|
Not at all, and it is a ridciulous comparison, for any number of reasons.
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I do not understand the process by which you arrive at such conclusions. Someone was raped and the rapist not only walks around with no conseuqence but has his spokespeople mock the victim.
|
No Penske, you asshole. Someone says she was raped, and might have been raped, 25 years ago. I tend to believe her, but we will never know and can never know the truth (given the facts as alleged). There is a difference.
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Again I would ask how you would like it if the victim here was a close family member? And if you would be outraged, why is your outrage limited to just family members? Shouldn't our laws protect all of us, whether they are related to us or not? Should we all, and especially lawyers, advocate for such process?
|
See above. I'd be willing to give you more credit for actually believing this when I see you apply the same sort of concern for the rule of law to your own political party.
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Interesting morality you exhibit. Clinton's a rapist, but it's been 25 years since he wasn't punished for it so I am a tasteless asshole for pointing it out. Maybe to reform my image I should emulate Clinton.
|
No, you are a tasteless asshole for any number of reasons, but not for typing the above.
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Poll: If I throw my secretary up against the wall of my office and thrust one hand up her skirt and one hand up blouse and fondle her feminine parts will all of all y'all who voted for Clinton vote for me too?
|
Depends . . how do you feel about the snail darter and who is running against you?
S_A_M