LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,026
0 members and 1,026 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-21-2005, 04:06 PM   #3554
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,142
Quote:
Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
I was referring to her more widely known theories regarding endosymbiosis, which led to her theory of symbiogenesis. I provided endosymbiosis as an example of how a specialized structure might have arisen inside a single-celled organism, and as a backdoor introduction to her theories of symbiogenesis as a mechanism for the development of an organ system.

Regardless of whether you buy the latter, it is silly to say that evolution requires that a single cell can develop an organ system. Evolutionary mechanisms are the subject of great debate and theories like those of Gould and Margulis continue to move the field forward - regardless of how attractive or ugly their authors might be.
1 mutation that could do it, or a step towards it. that's all I ask.

Evolution is pretty certain- we've actually found a frozen mastodon, it's hard to not get it became elephants. But the gaps aren't just tiny gaps that are nitpicking- they're huge- big enough for Penske's first wife to run through big. Why does Seb say I'm crazy for merely saying you guys shouldn't be so sure, when YOU CAN"T EVEN GIVE ME A THEORY- fuck testable, I'll throw that out- just give me one possible mutation that could lead to organ systems.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.