LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,043
0 members and 1,043 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-21-2005, 03:41 PM   #3541
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,216
A Question of Balance

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I think you've got me all wrong, Sebby. I don't believe that taxes are a tool for social engineering. Progressive taxation is a means of wealth distribution, but I disagree that it's socialism. I think that progressive taxation provides a means for maintaining infrastructure and a basic safety net. I don't advocate equality of outcomes. Hell, even if I believed in it as a positive good, I would recognize the fact that it isn't an achievable goal.

My only reason for addressing wealth disparity was to decry the fact that the current administration, among its other spendthrift habits, is going full-guns attempting to reverse progressive taxation, and that that is part of what is creating the widening gap in our soiciety.
"I don't believe that taxes are a tool for social engineering. Progressive taxation is a means of wealth distribution, but I disagree that it's socialism."

You've been conversing with me too long. I believe there's a contradiction there.

But as to your second point, I agree. You're right. I can't challenge that. All I can offer is the caveat that it is but one of many parts adding up to wealth disparity, and nowhere near the largest of of those parts.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.