LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,252
0 members and 1,252 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2005, 02:37 PM   #2313
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Differing Concepts of Justice and Freedom

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
I agree with this statement, with the qualifier that the moral code is also subject to change and a balancing of competing values.
I don't think values compete. I think values are determined by instinct. And I think instinctually we all have the same values. However, sometimes people confuse values with other instincts. As an example homosexuality. I think people's hatred of homosexuality is based more from fear than from instinctual values. The people are just confusing the two.

When someone says that how can you critisize two people who love eachother entering into a permanent committed loving relationship? That is not an appeal to logic or rational. That is an appeal to someone instinct of values.

When people condemn homosexuality I think that condemnation is based on fear and prejudice and not from value based instincts. But I think deep down all people understand that it two people love eachother and want to commit to eachother there is nothing wrong with that.

Societies debate of the our legal code, is an attempt to figure out which laws are based on other things as opposed to our internal sense of right and wrong.
Spanky is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.