Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
How about this? You set up some sort of lazer (that works automatically like those cameras that give tickets) that "paints" them with a signature mark that only can be picked up through infrared. When you get your hunting license you are given infrared goggles and then these people are fair game outside of their vehicle.
|
Sounds like a Dem's command-control solution to things. I'd just let RT drive as she usually does.
This prompts me to ask: If
red-light cameras do not decrease accidents, can they survive rational-basis review? Should we have them at all, or are they just a driving tax?
I initially bought the idea that they, and their speeding-camera brethren, might have a deterrent effect, which overcame my belief that they were principally to raise revenue. But without even that thin reed to stand on, shouldn't they have to go?
