Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Let this be an example to the board. I've gone to the trouble of going back and looking, and giving credit where credit was due.
I will charatibly characterize Hank's response here as reciprocation, though perhaps I am expecting too much of his vocabulary and social graces.
Hank, my argument was that the Federal Government was being less than cooperative in releasing documents relative to investigations on the torture allegations. Encouraging the Administration to comply with the law instead of resisting the airing of uncomfortable information seems to be a reasonable request.
In your usual rhetorical style, you demonstrated your mastery of argument in responding by shitting on it so badly that not even Atticus could pause to admire its smell.
Insisting that you've taken the high road, and that others have no point "beyond complaining" is easy if you choose not to concern yourself with whether the investigations are being unduly restricted. I suppose you're also a fan of Bush investigating himself for Katrina, too.
|
I won't pretend to have fully caught on here, but I thought ignoring the Hank Chinaski and Penske Account socks was the only way to carry on an intelligent conversation. Do they ever post anything substantive?
