Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
What use is there in posting evidence if you are going to misread it in this fashion?
And I thought you might bother to read The Economist.
|
I read the article (or at least the portions cited in that ridiculous Blog article) and I did not misread it. But this is all so ridiculous. The Economist did not draw the conclusion that Bush doctored the numbers. They said there are facts that make it seem possible and there is reason to believe that is was in their interest to do so. But unlike you, they never implied that they had a smoking gun (conclusive evidence), so they did not make any conclusions.
Know one knows whether Bush intentionally inflated the numbers except for people in the Bush administration. And at this point no one seems to be talking. So we really don't know do we?
Of course you seem to think that it is a fact. Are you privy to inside sources at the White House that I am not aware of?
