LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,059
0 members and 1,059 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,698, 04-04-2025 at 04:12 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-16-2005, 07:43 PM   #4107
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
California Schools don't have enough money?

Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
A Modest Proposal for Saving Our Schools


By Tom McClintock


[Fiction]
I love it when Republicans try math.

Of course, if you decide that you don't want a 35:1 teacher/student ratio the numbers change quickly. Likewise, this sounds like high-school, so you may want a lab (more per square foot and more square footage per student), you may want a library, you may even want to have the ability to gather all your students in one place (say, an auditorium), you may want a few other activites to go on in the building (say, an art studio space).

It's amazing what you can do to costs if you assume away a good half of the building and cut your teaching staff by another 50%.

These kids aren't going to get taught French or go to Paris. They're going to be warehoused until they can make french fries. And no team sports, either (because fields are too expensive), but we'll have 'em doing knee bends like there's no tomorrow. Because they'll need to reach under the sink to get the dishwashing soap.

(By the way, if I haven't been clear before, I'd be happy to dramatically cut admins and do some radical reshaping of schools -- but not like this. My goal would be to start with a 15:1 or better student/teacher ratio and figure out what we had to do to get there).



Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 05-16-2005 at 07:58 PM..
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.