![]() |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
Look, the point is this: if it is morally reprehensible to take an innocent life, then it is morally reprehensible to use nuclear weapons to wipe out entire cities. But people (and nations) are often faced with a choice between a morally reprehensible act and extinction. Sometimes people choose extinction, more often they choose the morally reprehensible act. I'm glad we, as a nation (hi, Hank!) didn't choose extinction. But let's not pretend that incinerating innocent people isn't morally reprehensible -- no matter who does it or for what reason. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
we blew them up to try and make Americans safer- in your perfect hindsight world was there a better way? You and your boys can study that shit in your classes up at Ivy. I frankly could give a crap. Or are you saying Pearl Harbor was just a petty crime? |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
Yes, no, and yes, I'm inclined to think. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
http://www.shamrock.internetdsl.pl/h...a/IRA/ira3.jpg |
strategic bombing
Quote:
I'm not excusing the shooting of those Japanese soldiers who did attempt to surrender. But simply saying "it went both ways" is absurd. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
I think it is much easier to justify the Atomic Bombs than the Fire bombing of Tokyo (which killed a hell of a lot more people). I don't think anyone believe that the firebombing was going to get Japan to surrender. The focus of it also was on the wood and rice paper structures, which generally did not house manufacturing. When I was living in Japan I never felt ashamed of the Atomic Bombs, but I didn't feel ashamed about the Firebombing. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
"You maggots! Let me see your surrender face! Is that the best you can do? I want to see fear, goddammit! I want to see groveling! You beg for mercy like old people fuck, do you know that private?" |
strategic bombing
Quote:
And let's remember, also, that during the war the Emperor was not merely infallible, but divine. People tend to fight pretty hard for a god, whether they be nominally soldiers or civilians. In sum, while in hindsight I'm sure you could pick attacks that were not warranted in any strategic or national morale sense, I would say this in very, very few instances. This excludes individuals shooting prisoners or surrendering soldiers, but that wasn't what we were discussing. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
It takes two to tango? If they are shooting our soldiers when they surrender, that means ipso facto we are shooting theirs? That's some interesting logic. Read Freedom from Fear. It paints a very different picture, and indicates pretty strongly that the reason so few Japanese prisoners were taken is because they were so unwilling to surrender. And when did this become the Politics Sixty Years Ago Board? |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
We're also working our way backwards in time. Come back in a couple of weeks -- we'll be working on the Peloponnesian War, in a calculated attempt to bring Atticus back with something particularly scathing to say about Thucydides. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
War, even a just war, is a bad thing. People do bad stuff, mostly because there is no good alternative, but not always. The Allies admittedly did some things that have no real justification. But there is a very significant difference between Marines at the front lines choosing to shoot individuals first and ask questions later (and Japanese soldiers doing the same thing to us) and the systematic torture, starvation, and mistreatment that faced the tens of thousands of Allied troops who surrendered when Singapore and the Phillipenes fell. Was the war in the Pacific more brutal than the one in Western Europe? Absolutely. Can one honestly compare the way the Allies acted to the way the Japanese acted, and conclude that they were similar? No fricken way. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
I'm sure the Japanese were unwilling to surrender. My point is, they had good reasons. Re Freedom From Fear, assuming you mean this, and not one of these: http://content.powells.com/cgi-bin/i...sbn=0893892297 http://content.powells.com/cgi-bin/i...sbn=0736900721 Or maybe Swami Rama is your kind of thing, NTTAWWT. |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
See - his nose is cold.
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
The average Japanese soldier was still Japanese, living in a culture that was informed very heavily by the Bushido code, and believing that the Emperor who directed the fighting was a god. This is the basic reason that they refused to surrender, in a way that is unprecedented. I can't see how you can ascribe that to anything else -- Americans certainly were not tremendously nicer to Germans, yet they surrendered in droves. Japanese, virtually not at all. This is also the basic reason why even average soldiers participated in Banzai attacks and Kamikaze attacks. I've read some of the writings of Kamikaze pilots from the night before they flew. Many were average soldiers, did not see themselves as samurai, but still saw themselves as obligated to throw their lives away in service of the emperor. I guess that's all propaganda too, huh? |
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
strategic bombing
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com