LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=661)

bilmore 03-15-2005 02:44 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I am so glad you posted that thing about eyes rolling and wrists being patted and people saying "yes dear," because it so perfectly describes my reaction to the vast majority of your, slave's, and penske's socks' posts. Though, sometimes I think "jesus fucking christ!" instead of "yes dear" and my wrist pats might involve fists.

I'm sure you know that, but I wanted to thank you.

fwiw, I have that reaction to Ty/G3 sometimes, too. But not as frequently.
I'm curious. O'Neil strikes me as a fairly reasonable guy, and he did have virtually every one of Kerry's Nam superiors lined up and saying Kerry was unfit - and giving reasons based on specific events in VN. (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here, and assuning you read the interview, and didn't do the reflexive "oh, the Swift Boat Jerks" thing.)

Plus, the stuff they claimed about Kerry ended up about 1/2 proven, 1/4 contested in differing characterizations, and 1/4 contested with factual assertions, all of which leaves me unable to do what Dems seem to have done, which is to completely ignore and demonize them.

Do you just totally disbelieve all of those people on faith - especially all of those in that group of his commanders - and then chuckle patronizingly when someone mentions them - or do you have some unshared info that allows you to make a reasoned judgment that they are bad, or wrong, or . . . ?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-15-2005 02:45 PM

New Rankings In!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Typically, drunken sailors don't have that much money, so this is a misnomer. He's spending like a drunken sales executive on an expense-account junket.
For someone as old as you are, you've lost a lot of perspective.

Back in the day, a sailor would come into port after a year at sea hunting whales and shit, and if it was a successful hunt, they'd be downright rich by the days standards. Two or three successful hunts and you were set for life.

They'd also have had no sex (except to the extent a guy name Quequeeq lent them his pole) in over a year.

So they had lots of money, but it was not just spending money, but the way they spent it. A coked up i-banker just isn't going to spend like a drunken sailor.

Clinton would have known how to spend like a drunken sailor, though he never did. Bush hasn't spent like a drunken sailor since his coke days, and even then I have trouble seeing wild-eyed doped up George throwing hundreds at loose women to do unusual things. Let's face it, we haven't seen a president who could and did really spend like a drunken sailor since JFK.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-15-2005 02:46 PM

How'd you get so Fly?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I'm curious. O'Neil strikes me as a fairly reasonable guy, and he did have virtually every one of Kerry's Nam superiors lined up and saying Kerry was unfit - and giving reasons based on specific events in VN. (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here, and assuning you read the interview, and didn't do the reflexive "oh, the Swift Boat Jerks" thing.)

Plus, the stuff they claimed about Kerry ended up about 1/2 proven, 1/4 contested in differing characterizations, and 1/4 contested with factual assertions, all of which leaves me unable to do what Dems seem to have done, which is to completely ignore and demonize them.

Do you just totally disbelieve all of those people on faith - especially all of those in that group of his commanders - and then chuckle patronizingly when someone mentions them - or do you have some unshared info that allows you to make a reasoned judgment that they are bad, or wrong, or . . . ?

Fishing with bait is wimpy.

Shape Shifter 03-15-2005 02:50 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore


"TAE: At the Swift Boat veterans' May 4 press conference you had an open letter calling Kerry unfit to be Commander in Chief. It was signed by virtually all of John Kerry's commanders in Vietnam. Yet the story fell flat. The media ignored it. How did your group react to the media blackout?
Cite, please.

Quote:

O'NEILL: We were shocked. We couldn't believe it. I haven't been involved in politics or media relations, and I thought the job of the media was primarily to report the facts. It was obvious to me that many hundreds of his former comrades coming forward to say that he lied about his record in Vietnam and that he was unfit to be President would be important information for Americans. I only then became aware of the bias of the media.
Then and only then. Yeah, right.

Quote:

TAE: How do you explain the media's response?

O'NEILL: The establishment media was very pro-Kerry. They were opposed to any story that was critical of Kerry, and I believe that they were captured by their own bias. We met with one reporter around that time. We told a story to him relating to Kerry's service. He acknowledged it was true and terribly important. And he told us he would not print it because it would help George Bush.
Cite, please.

Quote:

That's when we began to realize we had a real problem on our hands.

TAE: Is there anything other than pro-Kerry bias to account for the establishment media's attitude to the story?

O'NEILL: Perhaps a second factor is that there are very few veterans in the established media. It makes it very difficult for them to understand the story or to care about it. That's very different from the situation 40 or 50 years ago when most people had served in some fashion in the armed forces or had uncles or brothers who had.

TAE: Did your group consider giving up?

O'NEILL: We couldn't give up because in the end our objective was to get our facts out. We had to be able to look at ourselves the day after the election and know we had done everything we could. If we were simply shouting in the desert, we would still have to shout.

Our analysis after the press conference was that the three major networks, the New York Times, and the Washington Post would under no circumstances carry a story like ours, no matter how well documented.
Cite, please. My recollection is that is was the lack of documentation that raised doubts.

Quote:

he strategy we devised first involved use of a fifteenth-century method of communication; that is, writing a book, which may sound strange in the telecommunications age. But that book, Unfit for Command, sold over 850,000 copies. I've often mused how funny it is that the New York Times had to list it as No. 1 on its bestseller list. The second thing we did was run, with the small amount of money we had, our ad, which featured 15 of us.

TAE: Did your group come up with the content of the ads?

O'NEILL: Yes, the content had to come from us. There's not an advertising firm in the world that's ever been on a Swift Boat. And none of them were there on the day of March 14 when Kerry fled on the Bay Hop.

The same thing is true of the second ad. None of us will ever forget the day Kerry testi-fied before Congress. It was like the Kennedy assassination. And so we just couldn't live in the United States if we didn't make a statement about his testimony in 1971."
And O'Neill's been making statements about it since 1971. What a hack.

slavio 03-15-2005 02:51 PM

Wow
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop


I think most of the blog comments are from Penske,
The secret admin powers lead me to think that description holds for everyone who posts here regularly.

bilmore 03-15-2005 02:53 PM

New Rankings In!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
For someone as old as you are, you've lost a lot of perspective.
I have to bow to your better knowledge of the sea. I suppose we all know the most about our own eras.

So, if anyone has any questions about the kon-Tiki . . .

bilmore 03-15-2005 02:56 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Cite, please.
That was the TAE interviewer.

Quote:

Cite, please.
That was O'Neil


Quote:

Cite, please.
That was O'Neil again.


Quote:

And O'Neill's been making statements about it since 1971. What a hack.
Well, you've convinced me. College debate team?

Shape Shifter 03-15-2005 03:04 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
That was the TAE interviewer.
So the media ignored this whole thing? I don't think so. We all seem to know about it.

Quote:

That was O'Neil
Yes, and I want a specific cite, cause I think he's making this up. If what he says is true, why isn't he naming names? Is he afraid he'll be Fostered?


Quote:

That was O'Neil again.
Right. And I want to know the basis for his assertion.


Quote:

Well, you've convinced me. College debate team?
Kerry lost the election, thank in no small part to R stooges like O'Neill. The horse is dead, Mikolka. You can stop beating it now.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-15-2005 03:10 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
So the media ignored this whole thing? I don't think so. We all seem to know about it.



Yes, and I want a specific cite, cause I think he's making this up. If what he says is true, why isn't he naming names? Is he afraid he'll be Fostered?




Right. And I want to know the basis for his assertion.




Kerry lost the election, thank in no small part to R stooges like O'Neill. The horse is dead, Mikolka. You can stop beating it now.
How did the worm taste?

Hey, Bilmore, tell us about what Saddam was going to do with all those WMD again?

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:18 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
How did the worm taste?

Hey, Bilmore, tell us about what Saddam was going to do with all those WMD again?
Problem is, this pretty much sums up the "substantive" responses to the SBV's during the election. Lots of reporters and anchors and bloggers and dems yelling "effin liars!", and not talking about what they said. I mean, look at the substantive responses here. The best so far is "cite!", after nine months of cites.

SlaveNoMore 03-15-2005 03:20 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

bilmore
Problem is, this pretty much sums up the "substantive" responses to the SBV's during the election. Lots of reporters and anchors and bloggers and dems yelling "effin liars!", and not talking about what they said. I mean, look at the substantive responses here. The best so far is "cite!", after nine months of cites.
44 days ago, John Kerry promised, on national TV [Hardball, for those that care], to sign form SF-180 and release his military records.

He has yet to do so. And the blogs are keeping track.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:21 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Do you just totally disbelieve all of those people on faith - especially all of those in that group of his commanders - and then chuckle patronizingly when someone mentions them - or do you have some unshared info that allows you to make a reasoned judgment that they are bad, or wrong, or . . . ?
I don't have the time today to give your post the Fisking it deserves. The Swift Boat Vets proved long ago that they were more interested in getting Kerry than in getting it right. They have zero credibility, like the stopped clock that's right twice a day (mine just blinks, but whatever). O'Neill and the vets most responsible for decades of trying to assassinate Kerry's character are well and truly bothered by his public opposition to the war, for reasons that most of the rest of the country long ago worked past. O'Neill suggests this in that interview, but has largely opted to slime Kerry on other questions instead of taking him on the real issue, knowing that his sound lost that round in the 1970s. Like the libertarians who can't get over the New Deal, O'Neill is still fighting the War. It would have been nice to think that the silver lining to November's election results would be that we don't have to listen to this crap anymore, because it is nauseating on so many levels, but I guess that's too much to ask for.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:24 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't have the time today to give your post the Fisking it deserves. The Swift Boat Vets proved long ago that they were more interested in getting Kerry than in getting it right. They have zero credibility, like the stopped clock that's right twice a day (mine just blinks, but whatever). O'Neill and the vets most responsible for decades of trying to assassinate Kerry's character are well and truly bothered by his public opposition to the war, for reasons that most of the rest of the country long ago worked past. O'Neill suggests this in that interview, but has largely opted to slime Kerry on other questions instead of taking him on the real issue, knowing that his sound lost that round in the 1970s. Like the libertarians who can't get over the New Deal, O'Neill is still fighting the War. It would have been nice to think that the silver lining to November's election results would be that we don't have to listen to this crap anymore, because it is nauseating on so many levels, but I guess that's too much to ask for.
It would have been shorter to just type "effin' liars!"

Again, absolutely no response to what was said. All those commanders were just lying? He WAS in Cambodia?

His 180 would go far in disproving some of the stuff, and he's promised to release it, so . . .

Replaced_Texan 03-15-2005 03:24 PM

Wow
 
Quote:

Originally posted by slavio
The secret admin powers lead me to think that description holds for everyone who posts here regularly.
2.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:24 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
44 days ago, John Kerry promised, on national TV [Hardball, for those that care], to sign form SF-180 and release his military records.

He has yet to do so. And the blogs are keeping track.
Who fucking cares? I mean, really? It's not like anyone on this board is the charter member of the John Kerry Fan Club.

SlaveNoMore 03-15-2005 03:25 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Shape Shifter
Kerry lost the election, thank in no small part to R stooges like O'Neill. The horse is dead, Mikolka. You can stop beating it now.
Kerry lost the election, thanks in no part because (a) he is an arrogant, pompous windbag, (b) he is a career do-nothing politician, (c) he lied about his Vietnam and Cambodian service, (d) he made a mockery of the US Military after he returned, (e) he called his fellow soldiers/sailors "War Criminals" and (f) represents a party that is slowly becoming extinct on the national level.

Shape Shifter 03-15-2005 03:25 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Problem is, this pretty much sums up the "substantive" responses to the SBV's during the election. Lots of reporters and anchors and bloggers and dems yelling "effin liars!", and not talking about what they said. I mean, look at the substantive responses here. The best so far is "cite!", after nine months of cites.
Who is the reporter O'Neill mentioned, the one that said they wouldn't publish it because it would help Bush? Where is the evidence that NYT and WaPo decided not to go with the story despite it being "well documented"? And where is the evidence of a media conspiracy to silence the SBVs? If there was one, it was mighty damned incompetent, because I heard and read and saw this story everywhere. Maybe you missed it when you were crawling under rocks with O'Neill.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:27 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Who fucking cares? I mean, really? It's not like anyone on this board is the charter member of the John Kerry Fan Club.
He's gonna run again. You know it.

Frankly, as I think of this, it's sort of dumb for a Repub to talk about this now. We should save it for when he gets the next nomination, and then pull it back out. If we do it too much too early, you'all'll pick Hilary, and then we're toast.

Shape Shifter 03-15-2005 03:27 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Kerry lost the election, thanks in no part because (a) he is an arrogant, pompous windbag, (b) he is a career do-nothing politician, (c) he lied about his Vietnam and Cambodian service, (d) he made a mockery of the US Military after he returned, (e) he called his fellow soldiers/sailors "War Criminals" and (f) represents a party that is slowly becoming extinct on the national level.
Now I know how the Red Sox fans feel.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:28 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
It would have been shorter to just type "effin' liars!"
You would have liked that, wouldn't you.

Quote:

Again, absolutely no response to what was said.
We got deep into those details last fall. Perhaps you were on hiatus or something. Go back and read the archives here. Back then, I knew where to find supporting materials because it was current. Right now, it would take more time than I have.

Quote:

All those commanders were just lying?
No, most of those commanders were happy to lend their name to an attack on Kerry, but were not suggesting that they had personal knowledge of O'Neill's attacks.

Quote:

He WAS in Cambodia?
I have spent so much time on the Cambodia thing here. More than I should, given how skeezy these issues are. Go back and read the archives.

Quote:

His 180 would go far in disproving some of the stuff, and he's promised to release it, so . . .
As I said to Slave, who fucking cares? Is it just a pleasant diversion from the Social Security and bankruptcy spectacles?

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:30 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
And where is the evidence of a media conspiracy to silence the SBVs? If there was one, it was mighty damned incompetent, because I heard and read and saw this story everywhere.
Look to your timeline. The main media blew them off, for quite some time. It was only after the newer version of info outlets started pushing it that the main media eventually HAD to cover it. And even then, they started right in on the "it's all lies", and ended up looking very silly in the process.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:30 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
He's gonna run again. You know it.
Next time around, I'm predicting he has Joementum.

Quote:

...you'all'll pick Hilary, and then we're toast.
Ha.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:31 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Ha.
Well, a guy can dream, can't he?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-15-2005 03:31 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Joementum.

What, because two N.E. dems are better than one?

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:35 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Kerry lost the election, thanks in no part because (a) he is an arrogant, pompous windbag,
Yes. Too bad he couldn't pretend to be a Texas rancher and a man of people.

Quote:

(b) he is a career do-nothing politician,
Had he spent much of his career losing other people's money in the oil business, he would have that much stronger a candidate?

Quote:

(c) he lied about his Vietnam and Cambodian service,
I don't think that cost him any votes, but the negative attacks about it surely did.

Quote:

(d) he made a mockery of the US Military after he returned,
That's a load of crap. And bilmore is old enough to still be refighting the Vietnam War, but you are too young for it.

Quote:

(e) he called his fellow soldiers/sailors "War Criminals"
Some of them were, which was his point.

Quote:

and (f) represents a party that is slowly becoming extinct on the national level.
As Apu said, The South shall come again.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-15-2005 03:37 PM

Goddamn draft dodging druggie
 
Why is no one running with the Bush drug admission, anyways?

The media dropped that one pretty damn quickly.

Goddamn draft dodging druggie.

And we have been sources for each word of the preceding sentance than the Swifties have for any of their charges.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:38 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
What, because two N.E. dems are better than one?
I was trying to say that Kerry will do about as well in the next presidential election as Lieberman did the last time around.

As I said many, many months ago, and more recently, Senators are not nearly the presidential candidates they think they are.

Hopefully Hillary will prove that sooner rather than later.

Hank Chinaski 03-15-2005 03:38 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Who fucking cares? I mean, really? It's not like anyone on this board is the charter member of the John Kerry Fan Club.
Horseshit. You wanna talk about bias, the fact that most americans have no clue that Kerry hid those records, while MSM went out of its way to concoct anti-bush documents shows the pernious extent of the problem.

Hank Chinaski 03-15-2005 03:39 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I am so glad you posted that thing about eyes rolling and wrists being patted and people saying "yes dear," because it so perfectly describes my reaction to the vast majority of your, slave's, and penske's socks' posts. Though, sometimes I think "jesus fucking christ!" instead of "yes dear" and my wrist pats might involve fists.
the majority of Hank posts make her nips get hard.

Not Bob 03-15-2005 03:42 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
It would have been shorter to just type "effin' liars!"

Again, absolutely no response to what was said. All those commanders were just lying? He WAS in Cambodia?

His 180 would go far in disproving some of the stuff, and he's promised to release it, so . . .
I think that Slate did a pretty good job of rebutting the Swifties' allegations. I'll check their archives in a second.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-15-2005 03:44 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop


Hopefully Hillary will prove that sooner rather than later.
why would you want her to prove it ever? is her mere presence a drag on the dems?

SlaveNoMore 03-15-2005 03:45 PM

Goddamn draft dodging druggie
 
Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Goddamn draft dodging druggie.
Did you crib this from the "about the author" section of Bill Clinton's book?

Quote:

And we have been sources for each word of the preceding sentance than the Swifties have for any of their charges.
I have no idea what this means, but I do know that Dan Rather and Mary Mapes are now playing golf.

Shape Shifter 03-15-2005 03:45 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
I think that Slate did a pretty good job of rebutting the Swifties' allegations. I'll check their archives in a second.
Figures. They're part of the media conspiracy and this just shows the pernious extent of the problem.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:46 PM

Goddamn draft dodging druggie
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Why is no one running with the Bush drug admission, anyways?

The media dropped that one pretty damn quickly.

Goddamn draft dodging druggie.

And we have been sources for each word of the preceding sentance than the Swifties have for any of their charges.
'Cuz drugs is fun?

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:46 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
why would you want her to prove it ever? is her mere presence a drag on the dems?
I meant that if she's going to run -- and I'd rather she didn't -- I hope she loses in the primaries, rather than the general election.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:47 PM

Goddamn draft dodging druggie
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I have no idea what this means, but I do know that Dan Rather and Mary Mapes are now playing golf.
But not together.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:48 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I meant that if she's going to run -- and I'd rather she didn't -- I hope she loses in the primaries, rather than the general election.
I'll lay five bucks now that she's our next prez.

Hank Chinaski 03-15-2005 03:51 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
lay five bucks
She won't lay any guys. Almost cost hubby the big job.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-15-2005 03:51 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I'll lay five bucks now that she's our next prez.
You're on. I bet you five dollars that she is not our next president.

bilmore 03-15-2005 03:54 PM

Form 180?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You're on. I bet you five dollars that she is not our next president.
I hope I lose. I have a number of such bets. I just figure it's a win/win for me. If I place enough of these, the bucks might help ameliorate the pain.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com