LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Patting the wrists, rolling the eyes. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=661)

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-21-2005 01:06 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Let's wait on the clinton judge's decision on schiavo before throwing around the activist judge term.
The Rs embraced judicial activism with Bush v. Gore. This one's just a footnote.

Hank Chinaski 03-21-2005 01:07 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The Rs embraced judicial activism with Bush v. Gore. This one's just a footnote.
Actually that was stopping judicial activism, but thanks for playing!

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-21-2005 01:07 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
And winning is all, as we know.
Certainly more important than principle. Other than a strong national defense*, one wonders just what the Republican Party stands for these days.

* With a carve-out for taking care of wounded veterans.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:09 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Certainly more important than principle. Other than a strong national defense*, one wonders just what the Republican Party stands for these days.

* With a carve-out for taking care of wounded veterans.
Tax cuts.

viet_mom 03-21-2005 01:09 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Because that's what several courts have found that she would have wanted, and we should do everything in our power to ensure that our wishes regarding self-determination are followed.

Several people, including and especially her husband, have testified that she had expressed clear wishes that she did not want to be kept alive artificially, and though it would have been impossible for her to have foreseen this particular circumstance, the courts found that she would have wanted to be removed from life support.

We don't give blood to Jehovah's Witnesses in this country, even though there have been several cases where they've died for lack of transfusion. We don't force care on Christian Scientists to get care.
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe. But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be, Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them. In my mind, definitely worth more attention especially since Teri does not appear to be suffering pain (except when she is denied water in the middle of the latest pissing matches between Repubs and Dems).

On another note, I read somewhere that a "tycoon" (I'd love for someone to define that for me. Barring that, I'd like to be one) offered a boatload of money to the husband to hand over guardianship to the wife's parents. If that is true, the financial motive for wanting the tube out seems flimsy.

Replaced_Texan 03-21-2005 01:11 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Could someone post a link to this form we are all supposed to fill out? I think everyone I know is well aware that I'm pro-death under pretty much all circumstances, but . . .
Depends on the state. Go to your state's Medical Society (Texas's information is here) and look up "Directive" or "Natural Death Act") I'm putting together a list of resources for another site, so if you need information on your state, let me know and I'll probably have it in about an hour.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-21-2005 01:12 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Tax cuts.
True. You got there before I could edit my post.

robustpuppy 03-21-2005 01:12 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Could someone post a link to this form we are all supposed to fill out? I think everyone I know is well aware that I'm pro-death under pretty much all circumstances, but . . .
We should create a new thread - under the Fashion Board, since it appears to be dead today. (Ba dum bum.)

Replaced_Texan 03-21-2005 01:14 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe. But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be, Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them. In my mind, definitely worth more attention especially since Teri does not appear to be suffering pain (except when she is denied water in the middle of the latest pissing matches between Repubs and Dems).
So 11 courts reviewing didn't give enough attention to the issue?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-21-2005 01:15 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Could someone post a link to this form we are all supposed to fill out? I think everyone I know is well aware that I'm pro-death under pretty much all circumstances, but . . .
Including the present circumstances, no doubt. I suspect Hank would agree.

If you search "healthcare proxy" and your state, several will pop up. Please note that if there are questions about your mental competance, you may need to have a guardian sign for you.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-21-2005 01:17 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe. But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be, Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them. In my mind, definitely worth more attention especially since Teri does not appear to be suffering pain (except when she is denied water in the middle of the latest pissing matches between Repubs and Dems).

On another note, I read somewhere that a "tycoon" (I'd love for someone to define that for me. Barring that, I'd like to be one) offered a boatload of money to the husband to hand over guardianship to the wife's parents. If that is true, the financial motive for wanting the tube out seems flimsy.
Even flimsier when you realize, as was pointed out earlier, that most of the money has gone to the hubby's lawyers. He won't see very much.

As for Ms. Schiavo being "awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them", we went over this last week. The consensus among doctors in the field, including those who have examined her, is that these are at best autonomic reflexes and that her cerebral cortex is gone. For all intensive purposes, she is brain dead and there is no hope of recovery.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:18 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe. But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be, Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them. In my mind, definitely worth more attention especially since Teri does not appear to be suffering pain (except when she is denied water in the middle of the latest pissing matches between Repubs and Dems).
Her "eyes light up"? WTF are you ON? How can you tell that she is suffering pain when denied water? Have you watched unedited videotapes?

notcasesensitive 03-21-2005 01:19 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe. But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be, Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them. In my mind, definitely worth more attention especially since Teri does not appear to be suffering pain (except when she is denied water in the middle of the latest pissing matches between Repubs and Dems).

On another note, I read somewhere that a "tycoon" (I'd love for someone to define that for me. Barring that, I'd like to be one) offered a boatload of money to the husband to hand over guardianship to the wife's parents. If that is true, the financial motive for wanting the tube out seems flimsy.
I thought this discussion was started over at Lawyers With Kids, so I replied to your query there, but I'll cross post b/c this seems like a better forum for the discussion. Here's a good summary of the case to date. It includes links to the court holdings so far, in case you want to read up on the exact findings by the courts.

http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html

I think her husband has carried the fight for guardianship on out of an honest belief that this is what she would have wanted. That takes a lot of courage when there are people out there ready to vilify him for his own personal life and his beliefs. He's lived a long time with this.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 03-21-2005 01:20 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Certainly more important than principle. Other than a strong national defense*, one wonders just what the Republican Party stands for these days.

What it stands for and what the sheep think it stands for just shows how dumb the sheep are. The blind followers, also known as Slave, are the people who drive me nuts. At least Bilmore is capable of being objective. Many of these sheep are highly intelligent people who refuse to look objectively. They first look to liberal opposition of the issue before analyzing the actual issue. My dead grandfather, founding father of his town's Republican Party, would be embarrassed at the direction current "Republicans" are taking this country.



Vote Libertarian!

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:20 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Including the present circumstances, no doubt. I suspect Hank would agree.

If you search "healthcare proxy" and your state, several will pop up. Please note that if there are questions about your mental competance, you may need to have a guardian sign for you.
Geez, this is way fucking harder than people keep saying. And I have to pay for it??? Christ, what a pita.

bilmore 03-21-2005 01:22 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Right.
I was agreeing with GiGi, and expressing amazement that this continuing and apparent process has resulted in an R presidency, along with control of both houses.

Did you just call me Coltrane? 03-21-2005 01:22 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Christ, what a pita.
Was this intentional? B/c it's a great saying.

Hank Chinaski 03-21-2005 01:23 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
What it stands for and what the sheep think it stands for just shows how dumb the sheep are. The blind followers, also known as Slave, are the people who drive me nuts. At least Bilmore is capable of being objective. Many of these sheep are highly intelligent people who refuse to look objectively. They first look to liberal opposition of the issue before analyzing the actual issue. My dead grandfather, founding father of his town's Republican Party, would be embarrassed at the direction current "Republicans" are taking this country.



Vote Libertarian!
mmmm sheep......

Secret_Agent_Man 03-21-2005 01:26 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I respect that the courts have examined the Schiavo issue but this situation is unusual. First, we may have some flawed legislation on the guardianship issue. Maybe.
I am curious about your reasoning. Why flawed? Who should be the presumptive medical guardian of a married adult living outside the home? I haven't taken a poll, but I suspect that most married folks would want/expect their spouses to be in that role.

Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
But we definitely have major issues here: the hubby is essentially remarried and is in essence, the only true testifier of what the wife's wishes would be . . .
Does it affect the analysis that he began the new relationship ("abandoned his marriage" as stated in the pleading Burger linked) more than _five years_ after his wife entered the "persistent vegetative state"? That he first began to dispute her treatment with her parents more than _three years_ after his wife entered that persistent vegetative state?

How long must he sit by the bedside and mourn?

Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
Teri Schiavo is only on a feeding tube and most people who say "I don't want to be kept alive by machines/artificially" are thinking breathing/heart machines and Karen Quinlan; most people in the "unplug the machine" situation are comatose whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them.
So her parents say. But -- its been just over _fifteen_ years, and they're still saying that the miracle will bring her back. The pleading also complains that the husband denied their efforts to wheel Terri into church for Mass. [They also complain that he wants to cremate her rather than bury her ("in violation of her religion"). Baloney -- Catholics are frequently cremated.)

Also -- they aren't sliding cheeseburgers and milkshakes down that tube. Keeping someone alive via artificial nutrition and hydration requires sophisticated monitoring and maintenance. it is not trivial.

Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
On another note, I read somewhere that a "tycoon" (I'd love for someone to define that for me. Barring that, I'd like to be one) offered a boatload of money to the husband to hand over guardianship to the wife's parents. If that is true, the financial motive for wanting the tube out seems flimsy.
The figure in the news reports was $ 1 million. Some loony rich Briton.

S_A_M

bilmore 03-21-2005 01:26 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Geez, this is way fucking harder than people keep saying. And I have to pay for it??? Christ, what a pita.
"Pita"?

I could send you our Health Care Durable Power of Attorney form, but they'd have to ship you to Minnesota before unplugging you, I think.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:27 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Was this intentional? B/c it's a great saying.
"Christ, what a pain in the ass" is original to me. Please send royalties.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-21-2005 01:27 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
whereas this lady is awake, smiling at her parents and her eyes light up when she sees them.
Hint: that "news report" was filed by a "reporter" who actually is under contract with the White House.

caveat: I've heard nothing to support the rumor that Pixar also helped animate her.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-21-2005 01:28 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
mmmm sheep......
It's one thing when Fringie does this. We know she's just hungry.

bilmore 03-21-2005 01:29 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
It's one thing when Fringie does this. We know she's just hungry. But when you do it ....
Are you implying that they each look to sheep to satisfy different primal hungers?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 03-21-2005 01:29 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
It's one thing when Fringie does this. We know she's just hungry. But when you do it ....

Ewww. Just ewwww.
Ewe?

That's just baaaaaaaaaad.

BOTD.

You were making a sheep joke, right?

Hank Chinaski 03-21-2005 01:29 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
It's one thing when Fringie does this. We know she's just hungry.
mmmm ewe mmmmmmmmm

viet_mom 03-21-2005 01:30 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
I thought this discussion was started over at Lawyers With Kids, so I replied to your query there, but I'll cross post b/c this seems like a better forum for the discussion. Here's a good summary of the case to date. It includes links to the court holdings so far, in case you want to read up on the exact findings by the courts.

http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html

I think her husband has carried the fight for guardianship on out of an honest belief that this is what she would have wanted. That takes a lot of courage when there are people out there ready to vilify him for his own personal life and his beliefs. He's lived a long time with this.
Yes, I posted first on LWK b/c I was thinking of it in terms of a parent's fight for the life of and/or guardianship over their child. I agree, it's a better place here to talk about it. I guess I am less apt than Replaced Texan to leave alone a court ruling where there has not been a specific living will and also it is unclear what people mean when they say they don't want to be kept alive by artificial means. If I break the bones in all my body, I'd expect the drink of water to be brought to me even though I can't reach it myself even if though someone else's fetching might be "artificial." I am not comfortable with people (even judges, those extra smart people I'm sure) interpreting what someone's comments meant in the context of the law. Especially where it seems most people make these statements thinking breathing and heart pumping machines, not a tube with liquids.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:31 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
mmmm sheep......
It's mutton when it's food, Hank. And I prefer lamb. Or steak.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-21-2005 01:31 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
Ewe?

That's just baaaaaaaaaad.

BOTD.

You were making a sheep joke, right?
I was, but decided it was just so horrible I had to either spell it to hit people over the head or delete it. I deleted. But I was too slow.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:33 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
"Pita"?

I could send you our Health Care Durable Power of Attorney form, but they'd have to ship you to Minnesota before unplugging you, I think.
*sigh* this is fucking not easy. the one I have found for my current state is $5 and has to be mailed to me. My family lives in states that are not my state.

Since the feds are taking over, and your party is the feds now, can you have them just legislate this completely? Total preemption. Thanks!

ETA hank, don't do it to the lambs. They're innocent children.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-21-2005 01:35 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
It's mutton when it's food, Hank. And I prefer lamb. Or steak.
He knew that. Food wasn't on his mind.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 01:38 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
He knew that. Food wasn't on his mind.
See above re: innocent little lambs eating ivy.

bilmore 03-21-2005 02:00 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Since the feds are taking over, and your party is the feds now, can you have them just legislate this completely? Total preemption. Thanks!
Looks like they're trying that already.

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 02:01 PM

"The Form"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Looks like they're trying that already.
No, I need a federalized form. For ease of administration. Can't we make this part of ERISA?

Bucco Bruce 03-21-2005 02:06 PM

The Bush Legacy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Sure, when you're out of power, that's the best rhetorical device.

Let's wait on the clinton judge's decision on schiavo before throwing around the activist judge term.
(emphasis added)

Most of the federal judges in Florida -- including the unfortunate one who drew the short straw and got stuck with this case -- were picked by a committee made up of a panel of lawyers jointly appointed by Senators Bob Graham (D) and Connie Mack (R). Bush I and Clinton pretty much appointed whomever this panel picked. When Connie Mack retired and Democrat Bill Nelson took his seat, I think that Mack's role in judicial appointments was filled by Bill Young, the senior Republican in the Florida U.S. congressional delegation.

The judges that were appointed in the Middle District under this plan have been pretty solid non-political types -- I don't think that Judge Whittemore qualifies as a Clintonista. And the Eleventh Circuit (which will surely find itself dealing with this case soon) is pretty much made up of Republican appointees.

Spanky 03-21-2005 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
How was the Rhone Rangers tasting?
I missed it. I was too hungover

Bad_Rich_Chic 03-21-2005 02:23 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by viet_mom
I am not comfortable with people (even judges, those extra smart people I'm sure) interpreting what someone's comments meant in the context of the law. Especially where it seems most people make these statements thinking breathing and heart pumping machines, not a tube with liquids.
My impression is that the issue is less about the courts interpreting what her comments meant and what circumstances she thought they applied to, and more about who appropriately should make that interpretation if there is a difference of opinion.

Having a neurotic, meddling mother myself, I agree whole-heartedly with the common law position that, unless there is specific direction otherwise, that person is one's spouse (whom one chose, after all, unlike one's parents). Incidentally, while I have made that abundantly clear to all and sundry (including my T&E lawyer), I haven't signed the form yet, either. However, I'm less worried about my mother trying to keep me around for years so she can read me self-help books and style my hair badly while I turn into liquified goo than I am about an ugly confrontation over who is in charge. Which is, really, worse, since that hurts the conscious.

You are all on notice - unless I can by some means communicate "don't pull that plug muthafucker," I want you to pull the plug.

BR(after the organ harvesting, of course)C

ltl/fb 03-21-2005 02:32 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
My impression is that the issue is less about the courts interpreting what her comments meant and what circumstances she thought they applied to, and more about who appropriately should make that interpretation if there is a difference of opinion.

Having a neurotic, meddling mother myself, I agree whole-heartedly with the common law position that, unless there is specific direction otherwise, that person is one's spouse (whom one chose, after all, unlike one's parents). Incidentally, while I have made that abundantly clear to all and sundry (including my T&E lawyer), I haven't signed the form yet, either. However, I'm less worried about my mother trying to keep me around for years so she can read me self-help books and style my hair badly while I turn into liquified goo than I am about an ugly confrontation over who is in charge. Which is, really, worse, since that hurts the conscious.

You are all on notice - unless I can by some means communicate "don't pull that plug muthafucker," I want you to pull the plug.

BR(after the organ harvesting, of course)C
I would like the feeding tube pulled too, not just the plug. I think feeding tubes are frequently, if not always, operated manually, though this is based on one extended ICU experience only. Of a person who was expected either to die in fairly short order, or recover pretty much completely.

And I would like as much pain medication as possible, even if no one is sure that I am feeling pain. Don't worry about it shortening my life or making me addicted.

bilmore 03-21-2005 02:34 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I would like the feeding tube pulled too, not just the plug.
The IPod, however, should remain attached.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-21-2005 02:38 PM

Quality Control at CBSNews.com
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
The IPod, however, should remain attached.
Thanks for reminding me. I need to update my DPOA to make this explicit.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com