LawTalkers - Waiting for Fitzgerald

Originally posted by Penske_Account
It is not classless or disrespectful to the office. Clinton was a foul mouth, who, numerous stories have detailed, had no respect for the FBI (as further evidenced by his nickname for the Director of the same

You're bitching that Clinton had a potty-mouth? This is pathetic even by you standards, which generally rest at the crazy-homeless-guys-with-sandwich-boards level.

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 06:48 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You're bitching that Clinton had a potty-mouth? This is pathetic even by you standards, which generally rest at the crazy-homeless-guys-with-sandwich-boards level.

Why? Do I have a potty mouth that you know of? Do you think I walk around the office calling lower associates ShiteheadSlave or FuckyfuckerSlave or something like that? Do you think I walk around the office at all using expletives? (other than maybe with my door shut and no one else in my office or maybe a colleague with whom I am personally friendly)

I don't get your point.

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 06:49 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Why? Do I have a potty mouth that you know of? Do you think I walk around the office calling lower associates ShiteheadSlave or FuckyfuckerSlave or something like that? Do you think I walk around the office at all using expletives? (other than maybe with my door shut and no one else in my office or maybe a colleague with whom I am personally friendly)

I don't get your point.

FTR, I don't use expletives with clients or opposing counsel either. With youknowwho as my witness, I have had the opposition call me a "fucking asshole" and I do not, ever, never, respond in like kind. I don't care if others do it, I don't.

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 06:50 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
FTR, I don't use expletives with clients or opposing counsel either. With youknowwho as my witness, I have had the opposition call me a "fucking asshole" and I do not, ever, never, respond in like kind. I don't care if others do it, I don't.

although in my personal life I do. on occassion. Hank's wife likes it when I talk dirty.

Hank Chinaski

10-06-2005 07:18 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
although in my personal life I do. on occassion. Hank's wife likes it when I talk dirty.

Yesssss but she said your time limitations make it be monosylabic dirty talk

Hank Chinaski

10-06-2005 07:19 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You're bitching that Clinton had a potty-mouth? This is pathetic even by you standards, which generally rest at the crazy-homeless-guys-with-sandwich-boards level.

He hired sodamists, which was still illegal back then.

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 07:30 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
He hired sodamists, which was still illegal back then.

From Freeh's book:

The most unsavory of those investigations was the one concerning Clinton and Lewinsky. The White House intern had kept a semen-stained dress as proof of her relationship and a Clinton blood sample was needed to match the DNA on the dress. “Well, it was like a bad movie and it was ridiculous that…Ken Starr and myself, the director of the FBI, find ourselves in that ridiculous position,” he tells Wallace. “But we did it…very carefully, very confidentially,” recalls Freeh. As he explains the plan in the book, Clinton was at a scheduled dinner and excused himself to go to the bathroom. Instead of the restroom, he entered another room where FBI medical technicians were waiting to take a blood sample.

Sadly, when the whole truth is told I doubt that this will even be in the top ten most unsavoury moments. What a friggin' embarassment.

http://www.cliphy.com/spermbill.jpg

Shape Shifter

10-06-2005 07:44 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
From Freeh's book:

The most unsavory of those investigations was the one concerning Clinton and Lewinsky. The White House intern had kept a semen-stained dress as proof of her relationship and a Clinton blood sample was needed to match the DNA on the dress. “Well, it was like a bad movie and it was ridiculous that…Ken Starr and myself, the director of the FBI, find ourselves in that ridiculous position,”he tells Wallace. “But we did it…very carefully, very confidentially,” recalls Freeh. As he explains the plan in the book, Clinton was at a scheduled dinner and excused himself to go to the bathroom. Instead of the restroom, he entered another room where FBI medical technicians were waiting to take a blood sample.

WHAT?!! Clinton perfermed sexual acts with Monica Lewinsky during his presidency? Why didn't I hear about this?

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 07:48 PM

Open the closet!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
WHAT?!! Clinton perfermed sexual acts with Monica Lewinsky during his presidency? Why didn't I hear about this?

Cuz it's just BREAKING.......

http://www.freeholes.com/joke/toon/clinton/bill.jpg

Spanky

10-06-2005 07:55 PM

You go Pat!

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Because of the immense damage the Supreme Court has done to our society over fifty years, seizing upon and dictating on issues beyond its constitutional province, imposing a social revolution from above, tearing our country apart over race, religion and morality, conservatives cannot take any more risks. We are too close, now, to the promised land.

Hallelulah! Just vote no! Ta Ta Harryette.

Patrick Buchanan is the enemy and should never be quoted. He is a socialist (always against trade deals), he is in league with the worlds Dictators (he was against Kosovo and Iraq), and he is a social conservative (he is wants the government to tell you what you can watch, hear and what you can do in your own bedroom). He is pretty much for government invtervention into everything except when it comes to protecting in the environment and regulating business to protect consumers and peoples health. In other words he is all for government intervention unless such intervention is really helpful and necessary.

The man is not a true Republican (he left the party and ran on the reform ticket) and should be treated like a traitor.

Shape Shifter

10-06-2005 07:57 PM

You go Pat!

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Patrick Buchanan is the enemy and should never be quoted. He is a socialist (always against trade deals), he is in league with the worlds Dictators (he was against Kosovo and Iraq), and he is a social conservative (he is wants the government to tell you what you can watch, hear and what you can do in your own bedroom). He is pretty much for government invtervention into everything except when it comes to protecting in the environment and regulating business to protect consumers and peoples health. In other words he is all for government intervention unless such intervention is really helpful and necessary.

The man is not a true Republican (he left the party and ran on the reform ticket) and should be treated like a traitor.

Don't be so harsh. Without him, W may have never become president.

Spanky

10-06-2005 07:58 PM

DING!

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
the complexity of your meter is hot.

Diane_Keaton

10-06-2005 08:05 PM

Not for nothing, but....

...as someone who must take the subway, it pisses me off to read this about the security alert for NYC subways which Bloomberg has said was based on the most specific information they have ever received before ever about a terrorist attack:

"A law enforcement official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Associated Press that the threat is "specific to place, time and method," and that the method is bombing."

Fucking great. Tell us the time and place so EACH of us can make the judgment whether we want to be at that time and place. Excuse me if I want to bring sneakers and walk 2 hours to get home, and not put myself in harms way while chomping on Freedom Fries (NTTAWWT) and bragging how the terrorists "will never change the way I live my life".

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 08:05 PM

You go Pat!

Quote:

I generally agree with you, however, I don't think that you can deny he holds a certain sway over some members of the right wing electorate and correspondingly they are of a like mind to some/all of his positions. Also, while I generally don't agree with a lot of his positions, I think his piece on Harryette has merit.

[true story] [outable] Finally, ftr, fwiw, in my youth, with some of my friends, we would play act our own personal version of the McLaughlin Group, complete with a mock set, although we had alcoholic beverages in our coffee mugs. I always played Novak, never Buchanan. [/outable][/true story]. I think that should give you some insight into me.

Penske_Account

10-06-2005 08:08 PM

Not for nothing, but....

Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
...as someone who must take the subway, it pisses me off to read this about the security alert for NYC subways which Bloomberg has said was based on the most specific information they have ever received before ever about a terrorist attack:

"A law enforcement official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Associated Press that the threat is "specific to place, time and method," and that the method is bombing."

Fucking great. Tell us the time and place so EACH of us can make the judgment whether we want to be at that time and place. Excuse me if I want to bring sneakers and walk 2 hours to get home, and not put myself in harms way while chomping on Freedom Fries (NTTAWWT) and bragging how the terrorists "will never change the way I live my life".

Bloomberg should just become a demo already. He's 90 degrees left of Koch. Why the pretense?

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Page 143 of 334

143

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page