taxwonk |
10-06-2005 05:06 PM |
Calling Penske Out
Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
Perhaps you did. So what? I did not say "christian values" preclude including curricula that contains explicit sexual descriptions or themes, in part. I said that there is an argument that could be made that the term "christian values" included in the mission statement, as it was in that school's mission statement, could preclude such teaching.
Are you saying that it's not possible that a reasonable person, in the context of sending their child to a school whose mission it is, explicitly, to impart "christian values" couldn't come to that conclusion?
|
"There is an argument that could be made..." That's moral relativity Penske. Does this mean that God may have absolutes, but we mere mortals have to deal with conflicting rights, values, principles, and interests? Can people strike a balance?
If so, then what help does your profession of absolute right and wrongs offer us? If it is at best an aspiration, then what is left is compromise. Have I got this right or am I missing something?
|